- #Xml rpc client error illegal character d83d illegalargu driver
- #Xml rpc client error illegal character d83d illegalargu windows
#Xml rpc client error illegal character d83d illegalargu driver
The specified printer driver is already installed.
The redirector is in use and cannot be unloaded. The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed.Ī remote procedure call is already in progress for this thread.Īn attempt was made to logon, but the network logon service was not started. The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.
The security database on the server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship. The workstation does not have a trust secret. The supplied user buffer is not valid for the requested operation. The stub is unable to get the remote procedure call handle.Ī null reference pointer was passed to the stub. The binding handles passed to a remote procedure call do not match. The context handle changed during a remote procedure call. The file containing the character translation table has fewer than 512 bytes.Ī null context handle was passed from the client to the host during a remote procedure call. Unable to open the character translation table file. The list of RPC servers available for the binding of auto handles has been exhausted. The RPC server attempted an integer division by zero.Īn addressing error occurred in the RPC server.Ī floating-point operation at the RPC server caused a division by zero.Ī floating-point underflow occurred at the RPC server.Ī floating-point overflow occurred at the RPC server. No security context is available to allow impersonation.Īn internal error occurred in a remote procedure call (RPC). The requested operation is not supported. There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint mapper. The server endpoint cannot perform the operation. The binding does not contain any authentication information. The maximum number of calls is too small. No network address is available to use to construct a universal unique identifier (UUID). The binding does not contain an entry name. The universal unique identifier (UUID) type is not supported. The transfer syntax is not supported by the RPC server. The remote procedure call failed and did not execute.Ī remote procedure call (RPC) protocol error occurred. There are no remote procedure calls active on this thread. The RPC server is too busy to complete this operation. Not enough resources are available to complete this operation. No protocol sequences have been registered.
The type universal unique identifier (UUID) has already been registered. The object universal unique identifier (UUID) has already been registered. The object universal unique identifier (UUID) was not found. The string universal unique identifier (UUID) is invalid. The RPC protocol sequence is not supported. The binding handle is not the correct type. To retrieve the description text for the error in your application, use the FormatMessage function with the FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM flag. They are returned by the GetLastError function when many functions fail. The following list describes system error codes for errors 1700 to 3999.
#Xml rpc client error illegal character d83d illegalargu windows
For other errors, such as issues with Windows Update, there is a list of resources on the Error codes page. Though that may lead to compatibility issues with older XML parsers, and you still can't use the U+0000 NULL character, so you're never going to be completely binary-safe.This information is intended for developers debugging system errors. If you absolutely must round-trip control characters through XML, you will have to use XML 1.1. (*: It would be legal if encoded as a character reference in an XML 1.1 document. Perhaps really you need to be looking at cleaning your data. The serialiser should be fixed to stop producing them.Īctually I have no idea how the character (often used to mark end-of-file in ancient horrible operating systems) would get into the dataset used by an ASP.NET app, but it wouldn't seem to play any valid role in a name, address or e-mail. Whilst you could put some horrific hack in to try to filter out sequences before passing them to the parser, such crude hacks wouldn't work for the general case. No XML parser will read this, nor should it. As with most of the C0/C1 control characters, it is invalid-actually, worse than that: not well-formed-to put a U+001A SUBSTITUTE into an XML 1.0 file(*), even if encoded as a character reference such as . The parser is correct, whatever produced the serialisation is wrong.
0 kommentar(er)
